GE and the NYAD

Here's a different spin on the GE / Qs trade . . . GE and the NYAD. Those of you who have stuck with me for a while know my strong predictive feelings about the NYAD (on most platforms the symbol is $NYAD. TS makes it a little harder to display, but this is the Schwab StreetSmart Pro chart shown above). The chart above shows that the NYAD smooths out a lot of the volatility (or noise, depending on your viewpoint) that would otherwise appear if we use the Qs for our GE pair.
Using the NYAD enables us to see GE divergences from the NYAD mean (slope) farily quickly. As long as the NYAD maintains a trend line, GE's volatility will typically revert back to the NYAD trendline slope.
In the chart above the lower orange lines trace the NYAD short term trend line slopes, with a mirror projection of those slopes onto the GE price chart.
The blue lines define short term volatility skews of GE relative to the NYAD.
The blue circles define the turning points or reversals of GE volatility skews as they begin retracing back to the mean NYAD slope line.
The white circles capture the 816 crosses which I mentioned previously as intraday trading signals. It's interesting that on today's chart, 2 of the 4 circles correspond precisely with the GE slope divergences from the NYAD, and the other 2 actually lag the signals provided by the reversal of the GE slope line.
As a tickler today, we had a little GE/NYAD divergence that set up at 13:25 but quickly developed into a 10 minute squat bar on GE and that was our signal to exit the long trade with a piddling .12 gain.
My four 816 GE trades today netted .55 as GE displayed a strength relative to the Qs that was absent yesterday.
Using the NYAD for a GE baseline in lieu of the Qs appears to offer a distinct advantage and I'll continue to explore the possibilities of this pair and other NYAD combos in my ongoing research.
When, and if, the VIX retreats from it's current 60s level, these scalps will likely become more difficult to discern and less likely to generate an attractive ROI. Until then, these quick mean reversion trades avoid the risk associated with having to predict market direction.

Qs and the Pivots

A nice article in the new November issue of Technical Analysis of Stocks & Commodities by Jim White. . The Logic of Pivot Trading. Copyrights prevent me from posting the article but check it out at the local Barnes and Noble or Borders for free. What made me laugh out loud when I started to read the article was his test example . . . GE. Does everybody and his brother already know about GE and I'm the last to find out? Hey!, there's always another trading day so let's get on with mining some coin out of this thing.
Jim's arguments for watching the pivots closely are the same ones I've been preaching for years . . . simply put . . . they work. You can email him at jwhite43@roadrunner.com. Tell him I sent you and that you're a struggling trader (or some other pitiful story) and can't afford a TASC subscription . . . maybe he'll email you the article and/or some of his other links.
True to form today the Qs did their little pivot dance with my previously discussed 33.06 as the glass ceiling of resistance. Ain't it amazing how these pivots get hit day in and day out??????
Quite a few little 816 scalps today (blue ellipses). . . the only area of congestion developing the last 30 minutes of the 14:00 hour (orange ellipse).
General rule of thumb for the 816 trades is to stay flat for the first 30 -45 minutes while the opening range sets up. Sometimes that range becomes a trend for the day with little pullback, and on those occasions you have to be prepared to board the train and use an 816 reversal as a stop. Remember, these are daytrades, and are not to be trusted for overnight carries. Net result for the day 7 good 816 trades and 3 sloppy ones. I'll look at some easy ways to separate the potentially sloppy trades from the higher probability setups in some future posts.
No GE/Qs scalps today as no slope divergences developed. The only divergence was that the Qs closed up over a buck while GE closed up .13, revealing a relative weakness in GE. It'll be interesting to see if that relative weakness continues over the next few days or if GE and the Qs return to parity. I'm just taking it a day at a time for now.

More GE / QQQQ trades

I've got to admit a real fondness for these little GE/QQQQ scalps.
Since I mentioned the concept last Thursday I've received a number of e-mails from other traders who regularly trade the GE/Qs (and other) divergences. It turns out that one of the most profitable traders at a well known Las Vegas prop shop only trades GE but, as I mentioned Monday, the prop shops have capital, market making and auto trade capabilities than mere mortals like you and I can't easily replicate. There are ways to get close however, as per my closing scalp yesterday, although I need to study the details of the setup a little closer to verify that the typical trade risk/reward is acceptable. I'm also going to devote some time developing TS code to capture those divergences on 1 and 2 minute bars and/or a TICK basis. My trader buddy Larry, who introduced me to the GE/Qs trade already has such software, but I've seen it and believe it has some risk management flaws that need repair before I would throw money at it. Another project for my "to-do" list.
The Qs hit 33.08, so my Monday projection of 33.06 was off by .02. I'm always a little surprised by how well the LR30 channel manages to capture support and resistance levels, and when I fired up the charts today and saw the Qs intraday R1 pivot at 33.02 I knew the odds of the Qs getting there were about 100%.

Qs EOD uodate

OK, that was interesting. No news but big momo. Betting on the election maybe. New issue of SFO has two articles dealing with likely market reaction to Nov 4th results. Concurrence of both authors: McCain- good for markets, Obama - bad for markets. That, of course is based on their perspective and other market participants may have different views. Bottom line . . . your guess is as good as mine.
With such upward momentum into today's close, we may get a carry through tomorrow and possibly Thursday, but I'm expecting a pull back by Friday's close. And that's a stretch for me as my crystal ball rarely stays in focus for more than 150 minutes.
Next overhead resistance level for the Qs is at 33.06 or thereabouts.
Watch volume tomorrow to see if some that mountain of cash parked on the sidelines starts coming back into the markets.
Nice little GE/Qs divergent scalp 15 minutes pre close that lasted 10 minutes. In GE at 19.08, out at 19.45 for a really quick .37 and I was sweating every second of it. A lot of up volume the last 2 minutes, but I was out by then.
Markets are off a bit after hours so I'll be standing back at the open just to see how much retrace we get . . .that may provide a good indication of how much of today's medium volume surge was short covering.

Qs Update and the Pivots

Stepping back a little bit to review the Qs in daily, weekly and monthly bars with the 3 linear regression(30,11,3) study. Whether the Qs are destined to mimic other major indices that have already retraced back to mid-2002 levels remains to be seen, but the daily technicals continue to suggest that's a strong possibility.
The LR30 mean has served as overhead resistance for the Qs October slide. Until the Qs can muster strength to get above that line longside bets are best kept in check. For the present, even the shorter term 11 and 3 period LRs are downslope . . . yielding 3 arguments for the shorts.

This a little refinement of my ongoing weekly pivot study, in this case focused solely on the Qs.

The interesting thing here is that as the PP trends down (series 1-3) the 3 and 4 week moving averages of the R1-S1 range (series 4 & 5 have continued to rise. As long as these 2 slopes continue to converge, the downtrend is firmly in place.

We are clearly experiencing a new paradigm in the markets that probably has a few more surprises in line for us before a real bottom sets up. Today the DJ is currently up 156 while the VIX is down 4.5% to 76.5. Anybody who'd suggested a VIX of 76 in the midst of a rally 12 months ago would have been hauled off for psychiatric evaluation . . . but here we are today.

I'm sounding like a broken record, I know, but IMHO daytrading continues to be the best risk management approach to current market volatility.

GE / QQQQ Trade - Part 2

This post is a continuation of the GE/QQQQ trade post on Thursday.
Above the ratio GE and QQQQ chart. That nice horizontal line of the 20 and 50 DSMAs is a clue that this correlated pair trade has good potential. A lot of volatility off the mean to be sure, but for daytraders this is a good thing. If you run a ratio study of GE against DIA, IWM or SPY, you'll see why the Qs are the best correlated index to use.
A couple background facts to keep in mind:
GE is almost always in the top 10 volume of listed stocks.
GE typically trades 30-40% of Qs volume, although a recent downgrade by Zacks to "strong sell" has probably inflated the already substantial sell momentum.
GE is a favorite with several large prop shops, both as a pairs trade (not necessarily with the Qs) and as a stand alone daytrade. The prop shops typically hit it hard at the open and the close, when they can scalp the first and last few minutes of the trading day with mean reversion trades. This means lots of liquidity and lots of support for the mean reversion approach. A word of caution, however: the prop shops have very sophisticated program trading algorithms that execute automatically, so the open/close trades are not recommended for the average retail trader, as your odds of becoming cannon fodder for the prop shops is pretty high.
Although I mentioned the idea of a GE/QQQQ pairs trade in Thursday post, for practical purposes I wouldn't (and don't) trade it that way. I just trade the GE side. So how do you trade it? Well, here's one approach.
Above is Friday morning's chart of GE with the Qs shown as the gray overlay.
Since these 2 track together in the larger timeframe, the goal is to capitalize on short term divergences. The orange lines identify 2 divergences in slope during the morning session. It is at the point when the Qs are still trending up and GE reverses from a short term downslope that the high probability trades set up, which are shown as the small orange ellipses.
This is the same chart as above, but pulled back a little bit to show how GE and the Qs performed after the trade entries. You can also notice that when the Qs reversed momentum (slope) at 11:00 and 11:45, these were great exit signals for the GE long positions . . and a general risk management rule for this trade is to use a trend reversal in the Qs as an exit stop.

Weekly Update

Weekly pivot update.
The absolute R1-S1 range value has remained relatively stable for 3 of the 4 ETFs, although XLE actually declined 37%. The percent range for the upcoming week for the 4 ETFs has evened out at the +/- 20 level suggesting range contraction as the most likely next move.
The promising closing alignment of the PPs last week turned out to be just a pause in the selling, not a jumping off point to higher levels, and with a return to this week's slide of closing prices to the low of the weekly range, the trend has once again resumed to the downside.
Yes, we got a nice rally on Monday, but that turned out to be a good opportunity to sell, not buy. As global financial markets continue to unwind, the outlook for the long side is not favorable. All 4 ETF midpanel technicals are trending down and offer little optimism for the near term.
Volume MA continues to trend up for the basket.

For the week: Qs down 8%, IWM down 10% (new low), XLE down 5% and XLF down 11.75%.

The GE & QQQQ Reversion Trade

Here's a completely different approach to trading the Qs. Trade GE instead. I've got a trading buddy that I've known for years, quite successful and well ahead for the year. Like me, he likes to focus on just a few equities, but he plays them a little differently. His favorite play is a GE/QQQQ reversion. While you could play this like a pair trade, you generate better ROI (plus buy more risk) by just playing one side. He prefers the GE side.
Top set of charts shows GE and the Qs in 8 minute bars on Tuesday. Both love the pivots and the 8/16 MA crosses. The mid panel technicals (RSI, %D and StochRSI) are also eerily similar, as are the volume bars patterns, especially into the close. If you set these charts up side by side, this is the type of alignment you'll typically see.

Now, here is the GE chart extending 22 hours in 5 minute bars with the Qs shown as a gray overlay. Note the larger orange ellipses. . .these are areas where a divergence of slope and/or direction of the GE and Qs prices diverged. These are the opportunity areas. The problem is, of course, you never know when these little anomalies are going to develop. A lazy daytrader like myself can just monitor this chart/overlay off in a corner of the screen and wait for the trades to setup. With my platform, I can also set an audio alert to let me know when the prices diverge.
These are high probability trades. . . at least that's what Larry tells me and he's got an Aston Martin in his garage to back up his claim.

As an aside, check out the smaller yellow circles on the lower chart set . . . these are 8/16 MA crossovers that I mentioned yesterday (but now shown in 5 minute bars). Nothing wrong with these trades either, and while Larry got 2 trades in 22 hours, the 816 generated 10.

816 Update - Keep it Simple

Back in August I profiled a really simple trading system that bought (or shorted) crossovers of the 8 and 16 bar moving averages. Impressed with the results, I subsequently adjusted my previous 10/20 MA platform settings to 8/16.
Here's a quick thumbnail performance update of the 816 and my 4 ETF basket.
Per my usual backtesting, I use Elder's 1:6 fractal time ratio of 10 minute, 60 minute and daily bars. Backtest period is 500 bars, which is the upper limit that Schwab's strategy tester will allow.
For short term gains and maximum risk management this little study makes a good case for the 10 minute bars. Rather dismal win/ lose ratios, but the system is completely mechanical, no stops, no discretion, and it makes money. And . . . in every single case the system worked better than a buy and hold approach . . . which is pretty much a no-brainer in today's markets.
Sometimes keeping it REALLY simple ain't such a bad idea.

What Wall Street Learned from Willie Sutton

Willie Sutton was arguably America's most famous bank robber (until now, when execs of FNM, LEH, WM, MER and others have stunningly overshadowed his accomplishments). During his bank robbing career in the 1920s and 30s his estimated take was $ 2 million, even though he spent more than half his adult life in prison. When asked by a newsman why he robbed banks he reportedly said, "because that's where the money is". Although that anecdote was denied by Sutton in his autobiography, he did say the following:
"Why did I rob banks? Because I enjoyed it. I loved it. I was more alive when I was inside a bank, robbing it, than at any other time in my life. I enjoyed everything about it so much that one or two weeks later I'd be out looking for the next job. But to me the money was the chips, that's all." Go where the money is...and go there often."

Seeking Alpha recently profiled some of the better banks.
IMHO, worth a close look in these times when bankers are generally viewed as liars, scalawags and scum of the earth and when the shameless looting of depositor accounts and betrayal of investor's has become the norm not the exception.

Got an Hour?

I mentioned Nouriel Roubini last week and if you haven't had a chance to check him out here's the link to his blog. His spin on the markets is not something you're likely to hear from the shills in the adminsitration, but his perpsective and his prognosis make a lot of (scary) sense.
If you click through to the above link and then scroll down to his hour long Oct 14th interview video with Charlie Rose, you'll get Roubini's full analysis of the financial situation.

Visiting the Cheaphooker

This is an update of my Cheaphooker system that's posted on the side panel of the blog as part of my Dirty Dozen systems. The code is the same as the original, I've just focused on a shorter time frame (14 months) in order to see how the inputs have changed. Obviously I've had to do some tweaking of the input values in order to reflect the downward market bias for the past year The system has a great balance of longs and shorts and has produced excellent max consecutive loser ratios. Although the system generates a good risk/reward return, another way to use this system is to monitor the equity curve and pay attention when it starts to flatten out.

TS2000i code shown below:
I've left the code with programmable inputs so you can run optimization tests on other ETFs, stocks, etc. that might better suit your trading interests.

Inputs: Len1(3), Len2(10), Len3(18), Len4(1), Len5(10), Len6(10);
Optimized inputs: Len1(3), Len2(6), Len3(6), Len4(1), Len5(8), Len6(12);

If DayOfWeek(date)=Len1 and Close < Average(C,Len2)
Then Buy This Bar on Close;
If BarsSinceEntry = Len3
Then ExitLong at Market;

If DayOfWeek(date)=Len4 and Close > Average(C,Len5)
Then Sell This Bar on Close;
If BarsSinceEntry = Len6
Then ExitShort at Market;

Weekly Pivot Update

As expected, we got a range contraction this week centered on the PP. Rather amazingly, all 4 of the ETF basket closed at the PP and all four are showing momentum to the upside as the likely path of least resistance. While the upcoming week's range and % range remain almost identical to last week's, absolute delta has dropped significantly, especially in the XLF.
Also, for the first time in many weeks the upcoming pivots are very similar to last weeks, clearly a change in the otherwise virulent downtrend momentum. This leveling off may be an indicator of a bottoming process in progress, although if you viewed the Roubini video posted on Monday, you know his argument for the bottoming process to continue for some time.

Side note: I made a quick scalp in GE today, deciding to take my own advice from yesterday.
In at 19.34, out at 19.97 for a quick 30 minute trade. I should have stuck around longer, but had projects outside the office to take care of, so I walked off early.
But the thing really interesting about GE was in the Nov options, which I mentioned yesterday. Those same Nov 20 calls that closed at 1.83 yesterday closed at 1.30 today, down some .53 while GE was only down .19. Talk about premium decay. . .and the VIX was actually up 2.72 to 70 today (coming off an intraday high of 74.5). Go figure.

What a difference a day makes

With today's little 800 point swing and the VIX hitting 81 and closing at 67, we have recovered from new lows, shown volume above both the 10 and 20 DMSAs in 3 of our 4 ETF basket (XLF is above the 20, and at the 10), and seen an upslope swing develop in the technicals.
The Qs chart is incorrect . . Telechart data is not updating.
The Qs closed at 32.24, and are now poised at the lower channel band of the daily LR30. While the RSI 2 remains downslope in all 4 ETFs, this could reverse on a small pullback Friday. As some of my previous studies have demonstrated, Fridays have generally fared better as days to sell rather than days to buy. Whether expiration dynamics will muddy those waters remains to be seen, but all things being equal we might see a ncie rally develop next week.
For the risk adverse, some interesting buy/write plays.
GE, for example. With GE at 19.87, the Nov 20 call pays 1.80 or 9%. The 17.50s pay 3.45 or 5% with almost $2.50 in insurance.
Lots of other similar situations.
Hey! If Buffett liked GE at 22.25, shouldn't I love it at $20????

Sell New Highs - Correction

OK, I messed up. Humble thanks to Ramon for catching the error. Yesterday's Sell New Highs system had some poor coding on my part. I think that derives from my use of the HighestFC function to identify new highs. I originally decided to use that function because the intent was to scan a larger universe of ETFs and optimize the lookback period. For the IWM that lookback period ended up being 1 day and as a result TS generated trades both on the next bar and on 9 bars out, hence the 4 day average holding period. I should have seen there was a problem when a sytem generates 50 trades in a year with a 9 day hold. The chart above reflects the error in the coding, which has now been corrected to read as follows:

If Close > Close[1] and High > High[1] and Low > Low[1]
Then Sell This Bar at Close;
If BarsSinceEntry=2 Then ExitShort this bar at Close;

The resultant system has the same frequency of trades as the original faulty system, but the holding period (and risk exposure) is reduced to just 2 days . . a holding period I can live with. This is actually an attractive system to me as with the corrected code, the system has a relatively low intraday drawdown, a good max winners/max losers ratio, and trades on an average of once a week. If nothing else, the system should serve as a warning to momentum trades who still like to buy new highs.

Thanks again Ramon.

This could get ugly

With today's multiple closes on the lows or near lows of the day, odds strongly favor further decay tomorrow and perhaps beyond. Although odd and scary reversals can happen right at expiration it's hard to fathom what possible catalyst could lead to such an event. That being said, the highly anticipated mega volume washout may be close at hand, or we may just be basing at these levels before a drop into the real abyss.
I see Adam made an offhand reference to Nouriel Roubini, whom I referenced in Monday's post . . .I'm sorry Adam didn't explain his comment a little clearer. If you haven't watched the video yet, it's definitely worth a look and listen.

Despite the somewhat muted volume today, these are not bullish charts.

Sell New Highs

In my continuing search for market momentum opportunities, here's a very simple approach that sells daily bars when the close, the low and the high are above the previous day's values.
The time period under investigation is only the last year. Extending the test period back 5 years requires a little tweaking of the hold period and the lookback period for highest values, but still proves robust.
I like the max consecutive losers . . 1 . . and the 82% profitable is a nice risk/reward ratio. Max drawdown is a bit of a concern for this size account, and I'll explore possible ways to scale it back in future posts.
This is the optimization report for a 10 day holding range. Not sure what's magic about 9 days, but that's the number to hit for the past year. Holding this short anywhere from 3 to 9 days pays out a respectable amount. The other lesson to be learned from this little system is that new highs have been followed by extended selloffs, not continued new highs.

TS200i code shown below:

If Close=highestFC(close,1) and Low=highestFC(low,1) and High=highestFC(high,1)

Then Sell This Bar at Close;

If BarsSinceEntry=9 Then ExitShort this bar at close;

XLF and Lag

On the above chart pair . . Qs on the left, IWM on the right in 5 minute bars. At a quick glance 3 feet from your monitor, the charts are virtually identical. They both fade off R1 on the opening bar, bounce off the PP 30%, then plunge back through the PP to hit S1 at 14:45, show a little hairy bottom at 15:00 and then return to PP levels in the last half hour of the day. While the range volatility was more pronounced in the Qs, the pivot action was a mirror image.

Now let's look at a comparison of the same 5 minute charts today for the XLF on the left versus the IWM on the right. XLF comes out of the chute just below R3, slides through R2 down to R1 and then bounces back and forth between R2 and R1 for the rest of the day, closing just below R2 for the day. Clearly a strong day and a strong close.

Over the weekend I suggested that the LRs and the weekly pivot study argued for XLF to outperform the other components of my little ETF basket. That proved not to be the case yesterday, but was clearly the case today with XLF up 6.5%, while XLE was flat, IWM lost 2.8% and the Qs lost 4.3%. XLF's outperformance may have been driven by the adoption of the bank nationalization plan with the decline in other indices a function of the probable impact of that $250B drawdown on those sectors. Maybe . . . but I really have no way of knowing for sure.

What's interesting to me is not the underlying causes for XLFs gain, but the fact that it happened. For some time now I've been working on a timing project I call Lag, Sway and Slide and the relative action in XLF over the past few days has been perfect example of what I would term "lag". Traders who use RSI, %R and CCI based trading systems know well that profits can often be increased with reduced risk by entering the trade several bars after the actual trigger signal. Exactly why this lag works is not apparent, although I could conjure up a number of possible theories. I suspect there is no single simple explanation, but rather a variety of intervening market forces that can delay or slow down momentum in the markets. The trick is knowing when your trading signal is valid and on a short term pullback and when your trading signal is false, which can be costly. Daytraders often utilize fractal signals to both expose and manage lag. Traders who focus on 1 or 2 minute bars routinely toggle to 5 or 10 minute bars to confirm technical trigger signals. A multi-timeframe view of the markets helps avoid the chop inherent in 1 or 2 minute bars while at the same time lending confirmation to trade signals and providing logical stop loss levels. While the 1 or 2 minute bars may trigger a trade, it is often the lagged confirmation of the 5 or 10 minute bars that actually provides the higher profit, lower risk signal.

I'll explore lag, sway & slide concepts in future posts along with some practical applications.

Monday, Monday

Although the technicals looked somewhat bullish on Friday, they didn't look THAT bullish. And to add insult to injury to my market weekend prognosis, the XLF did not lead the charge up, but instead lagged most of the day.
Hey! it's a learning process and I actually learned a lot from today's market dynamics. The big argument against today's rally sustainability was the lack of volume, but given the lack of fade into the close, the most likely opening momentum tomorrow is, in fact, continued up. Negative earnings surprises or the usual revelation of of some new financial shenanigans could derail that momo, but today's strength was sooo unusual and big moves tend to carry overnight. Above is an update of this week's pivots as compared with last weeks. The yellow pivots highlight the weekly high/low range for the ETFs on the left matrix. The yellow pivots on the right matrix highlight the today's high/low range for this week's pivots. Today's pivot bounces off of the PP mean strongly argue for continued bullish momentum, and to show how expanded the ranges had become, today's 936 point gain only moved 2 ETFs of our basket 1 pivot and the other 2 ETFs 1.5 pivots. This behavior actually makes sense when we examine the %range values for the 4 ETFs. The 2 ETFs with a %range 19-21 rose 1.5 pivots. The 2 ETFs with a percent range 37-39 rose 1 pivots. Today's pivot range results correspond to last week's results, but with much more drama. Current values argue for short term range contraction, in order to bring the %range values back into mean territory.

Finally. . . a video link sent to me by fellow trader Dr. Carl Wyman. Because the video is an IDB product, the link will yield a video of J. Mazza (in Spanish). If you scroll down to the next video, you'll see the Oct. 1oth link to Nouriel Roubini. That's the one to check out before you get too excited about the longer term bullish prospects for the market.

Weekly Pivots Update

Above, the 3 LRs study on weekly bars.
Results for the past week: Qs down 13.5%, IWM down 20%, XLE down 14.6%, XLF down 3.7%.
The XLE did retrace to 2005 levels, as suggested last Monday. I frankly did not expect it to occur so quickly, but then expectations about recent market behavior have surprised more than a few traders.
The Qs and IWM retraced to 2003 levels, while XLF sank to its lowest level ever. Although its not at all clear that the weekend global economic summit will produce any meaningful results, perception is the key.

Once again our little pivot and range spreadsheet proved accurate in forecasting market range expansion, and once again I was surprised by the magnitude of the % range gain, punctuated by a VIX of 75 on Friday.

What is interesting to me is that this rather simple statistical approach to mean reversion was able to find some direction in the volatility of the markets. Last week I talked about the relative range contraction in XLF as indicative of a basing pattern. While this week's range activity was clearly in an expansion phase, the fact that XLF returned the best performance of the basket demonstrates the potential of closely examining range expansions and contraction patterns. Looking forward, what's different about this week's pivot matrix is that 3 of the ETF basket components managed to close above the low of the week by one half pivot and the XLFs managed to close above the low by a full pivot. Contrast that performance with the previous week, when all the weekly closes were on the low half pivot of the weekly range.

Things are looking up with XLF the ETF most likely to outperform this week again.

I read several articles on Thursday suggesting that unleashing the short sellers would actually support the XLF (and other financials) by providing liquidity. Whether that argument holds up to close scrutiny is subject to some debate, but the net effect was, as noted, out performance by the financial sector this week.
Above is the next generation of the weekly pivot study. . . a work in progress that is designed to analyze the probability of a single stock, ETF, index, etc. for mean reversion momentum. Clearly, we have a downslope trend in progress accompanied by an expanding weekly range, both in absolute values and percentage. I've added a graphical interface to demonstrate the mean version parameters, but blogger has done strange things and locked up when I've tried to post it, so I'm working on that little problem and hope to update this post early next week.